Green Energy Investing for Experts, Part II
Tom Konrad, CFA
The next Tequila Crisis will be a peak oil crisis. Mexico’s government is dependant on revenues from declining oil fields. The prospects for replacing these revenues look slim. Shorting Mexico Country ETFs looks like a good way to hedge market exposure.
In Green Energy Investing For Experts, Part I, I discussed why it makes sense to use companies and sectors that may be hurt by peak oil or climate change as a hedge against the market exposure in a green portfolio. In Mexico, peak oil is already a reality. Production has already declined , but, because most investors do not understand the irreversible nature of declines in oil output, the Mexican stock market had not yet discounted the damage that peaking oil production is likely to do to the Mexican economy.
Below is a quote from the Oil Drum about Mexican oil production:
The President just changed the head of Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) as the revenues that the state gets from sale of its oil (making up nearly 40% of the federal budget) dropped 30% in the first half of the year. Current Mexican Government predictions that overall Mexican production will stabilize at 2.5 mbd over next year don’t reflect the collapse of Cantarell, and also fail to recognize that the promised increases in production from other fields are not reaching the goals set. It is only a few days since the production at Chicontepec was “evaluated” after falling some 12,000 bd short of target. This field is still in development, with ultimate production targeted at 550,000 to 700,000 bd by 2017, but as it is already 16% behind the mark that does not augur well for that future.
That means the Mexican Federal revenues dropped 12% in the first half of 2009 because of falling oil production. This is not a one-time hit to the budget, but part of an ongoing decline. That means that Mexican government revenues are permanently 12% lower, and likely to decline further as oil production declines further.
I can’t think of any good way to make up for the large and growing budget gap. Raising taxes would flatten an economy already hurting from the financial crisis. Cutting spending would do the same. Cutting funding to museums is painful but insufficient. Debt is currently at 44% of GNP, a high level, but possibly manageable if the decline in revenues were cyclical, rather than permanent and ongoing. With declining revenues, default and/or devaluation seems almost inevitable. No option would be good for Mexican companies.
If the Mexican Governments’ fiscal situation is so dire, it makes sense to short Mexican companies, especially if the short is part of a hedge against exposure to world financial markets. With a hedge, the investor only needs to be confident that things are liable to get worse in Mexico more rapidly than elsewhere, or not get better as quickly.
That seems like a very good bet to me, so I looked for Mexican Country ETFs or closed-end funds to short. I found
- The Mexico Equity and Income fund (MXE)
- The Mexico Fund (MXF) and
- The iShares MSCI Mexico Index Fund (EWW)
The first two are closed-end funds with limited liquidity. The iShares ETF, however, is widely traded and liquid. It also has a good number of exchange traded options with decent liquidity, including long term LEAPS with maturities of over a year.
In terms of the hedging strategies I discussed in Part I, I prefer buying puts when I am anticipating a not-very-likely but potentially drastic event to affect the security. As I discussed above, in Mexico’s case we are dealing with a harmful event (declining oil revenues) that is already underway, and is likely to have harmful, if not disastrous effects.
Because the effects of declining oil production could be disastrous for Mexican stocks, I would prefer to short EWW, rather than selling an in-the-money call. An in-the-money call will cease producing gains once EWW has declined to its strike price; a short can be used to take advantage of declines all the way to zero.
To protect against unforeseen positive events, I usually combine such a short with a long dated out-of-the-money call, or with an in-the-money short call. In addition to liquidity, the availability of EWW LEAPS makes the ETF particularly attractive for this sort of hedging.
Unfortunately, as with many specialty ETFs, I found that shares of EWW were not available for shorting. Because of this lack, I chose to use a short call spread instead of a short position combined with a long call. This means that I will only be able to take advantage of large drops in the ETF by selling new with lower strike prices when the EWW share price falls below the strike price of my short call, which increases the cost of the overall transaction.
The profitability of this short position depends on either
- A general world stock market decline or
- The decline in Mexico’s oil revenues being more drastic than most investors are anticipating.
I personally expect both, but if I’m wrong about one, there’s a good chance the other will work in my favor. There’s always a chance I’m wrong about both, and that’s why I buy the calls. This series will continue with more short ideas that may benefit from peak oil or climate change regulation: Diversification makes a much sense on the short side as it does on the long side.
DISCLOSURE: Short EWW.
AIMER: The information and trades provided here and in the comments are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation to buy or sell any of these securities. Investing involves substantial risk and you should evaluate your own risk levels before you make any investment. Past results are not an indication of future performance. Please take the time to read the full disclaimer here.