SolarCity: Sunburn, or Healthy Glow?
fell 9.1% Wednesday when the company released its first
quarter earnings report, but gained all of it back and then
Thursday on huge volume. Still, the stock has plummeted 22% in
three months, and is down 37% from its highs in February 2014. Is
this just a healthy correction from its outsized 400%+ gains from
the IPO just 17 months ago? Or have we entered into a new lower
trading range more in line with financial realties? This article
will analyze current developments to this distinctive energy stock, and project
where SolarCity should go from here.
SolarCity Revenues Climb as Profits Fall
SolarCity revenues have been steadily gaining for over a year.
Revenues are up 34% from the previous quarter, and are more than
double the same quarter last year. At the same time, net income
has continued to deteriorate, with losses twice that of the
previous quarter. Revenues are not the problem, it is the expense
side of the ledger that is keeping SolarCity in the red.
SolarCity’s debt long-term debt is at reasonable levels, and improved slightly this quarter. Total liabilities/total assets fell to less than a percent to 69%. The current ratio, looking at short-term liabilities and assets, deteriorated somewhat, and now hovers around 2.3.
Comparing SolarCity debt levels to other industries poses a
challenge because it is a hard company to categorize. We classify
SolarCity primarily as a financial company because of the way it
interacts with its clients through financing, lease arrangements,
notes, etc, and how those instruments appear on the liability side
of its balance sheet. Looking at debt for financial companies is
different from other sectors because in many ways, their business
is debt. Having said that, the chart above shows SolarCity’s
current ratio compared to other industries the company is commonly
grouped under. The higher the number the better, so SolarCity debt
remains under control.
SolarCity Client Ratios
The chart above shows ratios of revenues and expenses per customer for FY 2009 through 2013. 2014 ratios are projected using current rates of customer growth, revenues and expenses. The results show a mixed picture for SolarCity.
Total revenues per customer have been steadily declining. This is to be expected, as SolarCity moves more and more into home and small business installations, revenues per customer get diluted when compared to its larger utility-scale clients. So long as client growth continues at an ample pace, which it has, falling total revenues per customer is not a grave concern.
Net revenues per customer, though still negative, have been steadily improving. In a company’s early stages, net loss per customer should shrink as revenues grow. This has been the case through 2013, and should remain around the same level for 2014. I view this as a very positive sign: the more this trend stays on track, the sooner SolarCity becomes profitable.
On a more negative note, SolarCity’s acquisition cost per
customer has risen to over $2,700. It is still below 2010-2011
levels, but has not improved at the pace one would hope. This
ratio must be kept under control as SolarCity’s business model
hinges on unremitting growth of its client base. Similarly, total
expenses per customer are below 2010-2011 levels, but have
basically flattened since then.
Glowing Profits or Wall Street Sunburn?
There is much conflicting analysis of whether SolarCity remains a good investment, or will turn out to be a case of Wall Street sunburn. I was concerned with projected time to profit for SolarCity in my previous article, and that bias remains. Total expenses per customer will need to drop significantly before SolarCity turns a profit, no matter how many customers they add. It could take several years before earnings turn positive.
On the other hand, SolarCity’s business model aims to do just that, bring expenses way down. By recouping the investment in panels in 5-7 years, revenues will continue to flow at essentially no cost for as long as the lease lasts and as long as the sun shines. And if its projections are realized, straight-line growth could mean enormous profits in the future. SolarCity is likely overpriced current levels, but I still remain bullish on SolarCity as a profitable long-term investment.
Individuals involved with the Roen Financial Report and
Swiftwood Press LLC do not own or control shares of any
companies mentioned in this article. It is possible
that individuals may own or control shares of one or more of the
underlying securities contained in the Mutual Funds or Exchange
Traded Funds mentioned in this article. Any advice and/or
recommendations made in this article are of a general nature and
are not to be considered specific investment advice. Individuals
should seek advice from their investment professional before
for more information.
About the author
Harris Roen is Editor of the “ROEN FINANCIAL REPORT” by
Swiftwood Press LLC, 82 Church Street, Suite 303, Burlington, VT
05401. © Copyright 2010 Swiftwood Press LLC. All rights reserved;
reprinting by permission only. For reprints please contact us at
firstname.lastname@example.org. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Roen
Financial Report, 82 Church Street, Suite 303, Burlington, VT
05401. Application to Mail at Periodicals Postage Prices is
Pending at Burlington VT and additional Mailing offices.
Remember to always consult with your investment professional before making important financial decisions.