« And the Winners Are... | Main | Hydropower: The Renewable Energy Elephant in Room »


       

Some Thoughts on Water, Electricity and Climate Change

Most forms of electricity generation use water.  Thermal generation (coal, natural gas, nuclear, biomass, and Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)) evaporate water for cooling, although they can substitute air cooling, but only by sacrificing efficiency.  Moving in the other direction, many dry coastal regions use desalinization to essentially convert electricity into clean drinking water.   A plant  was recently approved in Southern California, despite environmental concerns. Lack of water use is one of the less recognized advantages of wind and solar photovoltaic generation, but is a significant advantage in the arid West. 

Next week, I will be publishing an article which came out of a recent Hydroelectric power seminar I attended on Tuesday.   When a hydroelectric project requires a new dam, water will be lost due to increased evaporation, but even new hydro projects in existing channels will require consistent flows to be economic. Hydropower projects become more cost-effective with more consistent water flows, so expectations of future water flows are extremely important for planning new projects.  

The effects of Climate Change on water availability are much less predictable than the effects on temperature, and these effects are not limited to just changes in rainfall patterns, changes in evaporation, and changes in snowmelt.  According to Ken Knox, a water resources engineer at URS Corp (NYSE:URS), and former Colorado Chief Deputy State Engineer,  the largest driver of decreased water availability in Colorado (and the rest of the arid West) is not changes in precipitation, snowmelt, or evaporation, but a longer growing season due to warming.  Farmers, many of whom hold very senior water rights, are taking advantage of a longer growing season to plant more crops.  They then irrigate for much more of the year, using more of the finite water supply for longer periods.

For prospective hydropower projects, this means that new projects installed in existing irrigation ditches with senior water rights are likely to be able to generate power for longer from more consistent flows.  On the other hand, any project relying on less senior water rights is likely to see decreasing and less predictable flows, which will reduce the viability of such projects compared to how they would have performed under historical conditions.

For other decisions between renewables and conventional generation, and even when choosing between types of renewable generation, I expect availability and cost of water to be an increasingly important factor.  Nuclear generation for baseload power becomes significantly less advantageous when it must be shut down due to insufficiently cool water for cooling.  Similarly, there was local consternation in the Colorado activist community when our utility, Xcel Energy (XEL), chose to meet an Renewable Portfolio Standard requirement with a photovoltaic rather than CSP plant in the San Luis Valley.  From reviewing the regulatory filings, I became convinced that the lack of availability of water on the site made the choice of photovoltaics a forgone conclusion.  The number of  projects where the availability of water plays a large role in determining the final outcome can only increase as available supplies decrease or become less predictable.

Tom Konrad

DISCLOSURE: None.



was posted on AltEnergyStocks.com.


       

advertise here


Oil and Gas





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.altenergystocks.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/162

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Some Thoughts on Water, Electricity and Climate Change:

» How You Can Invest in the Pickens Plan from The Market Traders
A friend recently asked me how to invest in the Pickens Plan.  I named a stock (see below). He then surprised me by saying "You are the fifth person I've asked, and no one else knew how.  Several said i [Read More]

Comments

Interesting point about water & energy but you can put nukes on the ocean. They don't need precious freshwater. San Onofre in San Clemente, California is on the ocean (and it heats up the ocean in the vicinity!)

I just got some news from the city of Santa Monica. My water bill is set to increase by 10% per year for the next 4 years. As it is, I pay more every month for water than electricity (my energy intensive appliances use natural gas and we don't need a/c).

Nice, if you have an ocean handy, and want to give up beach front real estate. If you had followed the link, you would have seen that it led to a story of just such a shutdown in Browns Ferry, FL. France also had to shut down several reactors during the heat wave a couple years ago.

Naturally putting a thermal plant on an ocean works with CSP and coal, too, but that could raise more objections than Cape Wind.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Featured Companies











Oil and Gas


Search This Site


Subscribe to this Blog

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Subscribe by RSS Feed



Twitter Headlines

Certifications and Site Mentions


New York Times

Wall Street Journal





USA Today

Forbes

The Scientist

USA Today

Seeking Alpha Certified

Twitter Updates